A sanctions screen answers the easier of the two. The harder one is the enforcement history that is not on any sanctions list.
Not "do you check sanctions lists". It is do you also check for the enforcement history that is not on any sanctions list.
Convictions, law enforcement actions and insolvency records checked alongside the sanctions and adverse media layer already in screening: local sources where available, global databases where not.
Not established for a public claim. Record-type and jurisdiction coverage need a source.
A subject clean on sanctions but carrying a relevant conviction or an active insolvency is a risk a sanctions-only check will never surface.
Which record types are checked, and how far back, set per risk class.
Clean on sanctions but carrying a live insolvency or conviction is a risk a sanctions-only check never surfaces.
The record and its source, local or global.
Extends the same matching layer already tuned for screening, rather than adding a second tool with its own false-positive rate to manage separately.